Category Archives: EB-5 Blog Posts

Reblog: AILA Leadership Blog – EB-5 Up for Reauthorization


Written by David Morris and Carolyn Lee, AILA EB-5 Liaison Committee Co-Chairs

Part 1 – See more 

The EB-5 “Regional Center” visa program again finds itself in an all too familiar place – unless Congress reauthorizes by September 30, the program will sunset. For better or worse, the EB-5 program remains connected with three other sun-setting immigration programs (E-Verify, Conrad and Religious Workers).  AILA continues to be actively involved in the extension process and here are some updates:

Let’s start with a quick refresher. The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa classification has many street names, such as the “Entrepreneur” visa, the “Investor” visa and the “Jobs Creation” visa. By any name, the U.S. Congress created this program in 1990 with the goal of encouraging the infusion of foreign capital to benefit the U.S. economy. And to that end, it would offer the privilege of U.S. residency to an entrepreneur in exchange for creating 10 new jobs for American workers.

Ironically, Congress had to wait nearly 18 years to realize the major economic benefits they contemplated when enacting the EB-5 program.  Why 18 years? 2008 was the beginning of the global recession which created frozen credit markets; and without access to capital, businesses could not operate. This resulted in millions of Americans losing their jobs.

With banks not lending to even the most creditworthy in 2008, the real estate industry began to embrace alternative capital sources to finance construction and development opportunities – including the heretofore underutilized EB-5 visa program.

Today, EB-5 funding is approaching mainstream recognition as a viable capital funding tool for economic development. It has helped finance large scale development projects in many major cities across the United States, including New York, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Miami, Las Vegas, and more.

Let’s just look at data from FY2014 – during this one-year period the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service (USCIS) approved 5,115 investor visa petitions (Form I-526).  This represents foreign investment of a minimum $2.5 billion into the United States.  From 2008-2014, the USCIS approved 17,000 visa petitions, representing an estimated $12 billion of capital investment into the United States.

But more than the huge inflow of capital investments, the EB-5 program is also supposed to be about jobs and job creation.  According to a recent Brookings report, the EB-5 program has been credited with creating over 85,000 full-time jobs since 1990. And according to the FY2013 data, the EB-5 program has helped to create an estimated 30,000 jobs in the United States.

Almost all of this economic activity occurred since 2008 and exclusively through the EB-5 Regional Center (“RC”) Pilot Program, created in 1992.

It would be logical to believe that Congress is highly pleased with the performance of the EB-5 program. It has realized its legislative intent by creating thousands of jobs for Americans and infusing billions of new dollars into the U.S. economy, all without any cost to taxpayers.   In fact, one would expect broad Congressional support to expand the program.

EB-5 Bills

Part 2 – See More

In general, AILA and other industry stakeholders are finding strong bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate for the EB-5 program.  And yes, Congress has extended the Regional Center (RC) program numerous times since 1992.

But, and this is important, the current legislative atmosphere is uncertain and complex – especially involving immigration issues.  Many legislators, from both parties, want to address all immigration issues as part of a larger comprehensive reform package.  Extending just the EB-5 program and other sunset immigration programs could be viewed as piecemeal and diluting a comprehensive approach favored by many.

In the past, all of the sunset programs received a clean extension – meaning they were extended without any changes to the program rules.  But the EB-5 program has received significant negative criticism over the past several years; many believe the program needs major changes including increasing the minimum investment, addition of integrity provisions, and redefining the TEA provisions, among others.

Today, parallel efforts to extend the program are underway in both chambers of Congress. The goal is that these efforts will combine to fast track an extension which is critical given the shrinking time window.

In the U.S. House, Representatives Mark Amodei (R-NV) and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced H.R. 616, the “American Entrepreneurship and Investment Act of 2015.” If enacted in its present form, this bill would, in part:

  • Make the RC program permanent;
  • Require EB-5 petition adjudication within 180 days;
  • Exempt spouses and children of EB-5 immigrants from EB-5 admissions limits (This will save visa numbers and eliminate the China retrogression);
  • Authorize concurrent I-526 and I-485 filing;
  • Eliminate the per-country limit for employment-based immigrants and increase the per-country limit for family-based immigrants.

On July 30, 2015, U.S. Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Luis V. Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) introduced The EB-JOBS Act of 2015 which if enacted would:

  • Extend and reform the EB-5 program;
  • Create a new green card category for entrepreneurs who establish start-up businesses;
  • Create a new green card category for certain treaty investors who have maintained their status for 10 years;
  • Create a renewable reserve of 10,000 EB-5 visas upon exhaustion of the initial 10,000.

In the U.S. Senate, bipartisan legislation was introduced by Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Ranking Member Patrick Leahy (D-VT) through S. 1501, a bill called the “American Job Creation and Investment Promotion Reform Act of 2015.” If enacted in its present form, this bill would, in part:

  • Reauthorize RC program for just 5 years;
  • Increase minimum TEA investment from $500,000 to $800,000 and non-TEA minimum investment from $1 million to $1.2 million;
  • Eliminate state authority to certify TEAs;
  • Limit high unemployment areas/TEA to a single census tract; and
  • Create several different restrictions on indirect job creation calculations.

Together, these three bills provide a critical first step forward in the campaign to extend the EB-5 program. Despite Congress now being on summer recess, legislative efforts continue and we expect there will continue to be significant progress made to find common ground. A wildcard to the legislative effort is the imminent release of a report auditing the EB-5 program published by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).  AILA’s EB-5 Committee met with the GAO investigators and we shared our technical expertise.

AILA continues to meet with industry stakeholders and Congressional delegations to share our unique technical expertise in the EB-5 program and to analyze the impacts of any proposed legislation. Led by Co-Chair Carolyn S. Lee, AILA’s EB-5 Committee issued comprehensive comments to proposed EB-5 program legislation; these reports have been well-received by Congressional staff members by helping them understand the potential impacts of a bill’s language and, in several cases, identify language that creates unintended consequences.

Over the next 60 days and beyond, we will continue our engagement in this complex and fluid legislative process, and we will keep our membership updated.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Archives, EB-5 Blog Posts

Bills to Watch: A Legislative Rundown


Given the close proximity to the Presidential election and the inability for Congress to function as it was intended, at least for the last 7 years, my optimism for passage of meaningful immigration reform in the next two years wanes. After all, a bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the President to become law. With half of Congress running for President, it is difficult to imagine these politicians throwing politics aside to serve the American people. That, I believe, would be too much to ask. Yet, there are several bills that have been introduced this year that give me hope for the future of U.S. immigration.

H.R. 213: Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2015

Introduced: Jan 8, 2015

Status: Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

Sponsors: Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-UT3) with cosponsors Rep Raul Labrador (R-ID1) and Rep Zoe Lofgren (D-CA19)

Co-Sponsors: 25 Republicans & 14 Democrats

Summary: Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act would eliminate country-based restrictions on employment visas and to reduce country-based restrictions on family visas. Currently, the Immigration and Nationality Act limits the combined total of work and family visas to 7% of a country’s total population. If passed, H.R. 213 would remove all restrictions on the number of visas issued to a particular country in a given year. Limits on the number of visas issued would remain intact.

S. 153: I-Squared Act of 2015

Introduced: Jan 13, 2015

Status: Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Sponsors: Senator Orin Hatch (R-UT)

Co-Sponsors: 8 Republicans, 4 Democrats, 1 Independent

Summary: Immigration Innovation Act authorizes additional visas for key employment-based categories. Specifically it would create a sliding scale system for H-1Bs that would allow USCIS to issue up to 195,000 visas incrementally between April 1 and December 31. It would also start with 115,000 visas as a baseline. I-Squared would also increase the number of employment-based green cards from 140,000 to 235,000, it would eliminate per country limits, and it would reallocate unused visas going back to 1993.

S. 98: STEM Jobs Act of 2015

Introduced: Jan 7, 2015

Status: Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Sponsors: Senator David Vitter (R-LA)

Co-Sponsors: 0

Summary: STEM Jobs Act of 2015 provides 55,000 visas available for immigrants who have completed a doctorate degree in a STEM field from a U.S. institution of higher learning. All unused visas would then become available for immigrants who have completed a master’s degree in a STEM field from a U.S. institution of higher learning.

H.R. 2181: STAPLE Act

Introduced: April 30, 2015

Status: Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

Sponsor: Rep Erik Paulsen (R-MN3)

Co-Sponsors: 2 Democrats & 1 Republican

Summary: STAPLE Act would authorize certain aliens who have earned a Ph.D. degree from a U.S. institution of higher education in a STEM field to be admitted for permanent residence and to be exempted from the numerical limitations on H-1B nonimmigrants.

H.R. 616: American Entrepreneurship and Investment Act of 2015

Introduced: January 28, 2015

Status: Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

Sponsor: Rep Jared Polis (D-CO2)

Co-Sponsors: 12 Democrats & 9 Republicans

Summary: American Entrepreneurship and Investment Act would provide reforms to the EB-5 immigrant investor program. It would increase the targeted employment area set-aside and to defer to state designations. It would also establish preapproval procedures for commercial enterprises before an alien files a petition for classification by reason of investment, except for specified criminal or civil activities. Additionally it would provide certain immigration provisions and exemptions for the dependents of investors.

H.R. 1834: E-2 Visa Improvement Act of 2015

Introduced: April 16, 2015

Status: Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security

Sponsor: Rep David Jolly (R-FL13)

Co-Sponsors: 6 Republicans & 1 Democrat

Summary: E-2 Visa Improvement Act would permit certain E-2 nonimmigrant investors to adjust status to lawful permanent resident status.

S. 1501: American Job Creation and Investment Promotion Reform Act of 2015

Introduced: June 3, 2015

Status: Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Sponsor: Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)

Co-Sponsors: 1 Republican

Summary: American Job Creation and Investment Promotion Reform Act would promote and reform foreign capital investment and job creation in American communities through the EB-5 Regional Center investment program.

Leave a comment

Filed under EB-5 Blog Posts, F1 Visa Blog Posts, Green Card Blog Posts, H1-B Blog Posts, Immigration Reform

EB-5 Cutoff Date Imminent


According to Charles Oppenheim, The U.S. State Department Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division, there will be a cut-off date established for the EB-5 China category. His prediction is based on analysis of current trends and future projections in supply and demand for available visa numbers. In recent years, the number of applicants from China for EB-5 investment based visas has steadily increased and is expected to exceed the number of visas available in 2015. The result is that the EB-5 China category will be placed on a priority date schedule, similar to the cut-off dates for EB-2 and EB-3 employment-based visas. More information about this cut-off date will be available next month when the February 2015 Visa Bulletin is published.

Leave a comment

Filed under EB-5 Blog Posts

EB-5 Regional Center I-924A Filing Deadline is December 29, 2014


All EB-5 regional centers with a designation letter dated on or before September 30, 2014 must file Form I-924A and I-924 Supplement by December 29, 2014. The purpose of Form I-924A is to satisfy the reporting requirement under 8 CFR 204.6(m)(6). The premise of 8 CFR 204.6(m)(6) is that a regional center must continue to promote economic growth, improved regional productivity, job creation or increased domestic capital investment in the approved geographic area. The form contains detailed information on alien capital investments made, aggregate number of direct and indirect jobs created, and the aggregate number of jobs maintained through capital investments into troubled businesses, among other required disclosures. It also requires disclosure of the number of alien entrepreneurs and conditional residents approved, denied or revoked through the regional center. Failure to file Form I-924A by December 30 will result in a notice of intent to terminate participation in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. If a regional center has been terminated from the EB-5 program, it may not solicit, generate or promote investors or investments for any other EB-5 related project, or otherwise participate in the Immigrant Investor Program.

Leave a comment

Filed under EB-5 Blog Posts